PUZZLE: Unthemely #96

TLAAP_tile_martini

DOWNLOADABLE PUZZLE: Unthemely #96 (PUZ) (PDF)

I must admit my enthusiasm for the traditional crossword puzzle is waning. This Unthemely puzzle had been sitting on my desktop for over a year with a single seed entry placed in the grid. I didn’t have the interest in working on it until some recent events spurred my creative impulses and my desire to clean up the back burner a bit. I also feel I should revisit the independent crossword construction process now and then to keep my skills honed and preserve the “Unthemely” brand. I ended up throwing out the original seed entry and attempted a fill more clean than flashy. Enjoy!

PUZZLE: Rice Milk #30

TLAAP_tile_martini

FIRST (1 1 7) / LAST (9)

With my Oculus FIRST I unfurled
A high-tech, horror-themed, open world.
In my Grim Reaper role
I LAST many a soul.
The refresh rate was sick, though I hurled.

Comments contain the answer to Rice Milk #29 and may contain other spoilers. For information on solving transposals and other “flat” (verse puzzle) types, visit the National Puzzlers’ League’s Online Guide to the Enigma.

 

PUZZLE: Hollywood Vehicle

TLAAP_tile_martini

When I thought of this puzzle it seemed vaguely familiar. If it has already been presented somewhere, I apologize for the dupe.

Start with the brand name of an automobile (make, not model). Choose a pair of consecutive letters within the name, advance both letters one position forward in the alphabet, reverse their order, and move the pair of letters to the end. The result, when respaced, will be the first name and last initial of a fictional character who drove the original automobile in a film. What are the automobile and the character?

PUZZLE: Minus Sign

TLAAP_tile_martini

Last night I drove by the illuminated sign of a national chain. Two consecutive letters in the sign were burned out. “Hmm,” I thought to myself, “If one new letter were added to the sign, it could be used for a sandwich shop.” Later, I drove past the sign in the other direction. On the other side of the sign two consecutive letters were burned out, both different from the burned-out letters on the side I originally saw. “Hmm,” I thought to myself, “If new one letter were added to the sign, it could be used for a … Gilbert & Sullivan theater.”

What national chain was the sign for?

PUZZLE: Rice Milk #29

TLAAP_tile_martini

LEFT (7 3) / RIGHT (6 4)

My true love lost some fierce LEFTs on eBay,
Out-proposed on each swan, goose, and grebe, eh?
Lacking waterfowl, he
Bought some RIGHTs, and said, “See:
Storks and ibises in a pear tree, bae!”

Comments contain the answer to Rice Milk #28 and may contain other spoilers. For information on solving transposals and other “flat” (verse puzzle) types, visit the National Puzzlers’ League’s Online Guide to the Enigma.

 

PUZZLE: Rice Milk #28

TLAAP_tile_martini

ONE (9) / TWO (4 5)

Now my No Shave November is done!
And my face depicts gray, wizened ONE!
But by Saturday morn
I’ll be dyed, shaved, and shorn,
With those TWO fully plucked out — how fun!

IMG_3909

Comments contain the answer to Rice Milk #27 and may contain other spoilers. For information on solving transposals and other “flat” (verse puzzle) types, visit the National Puzzlers’ League’s Online Guide to the Enigma.

 

Unthemely #95

TLAAP_tile_martini

DOWNLOADABLE PUZZLE: Unthemely #95 (PUZ) (PDF)

* * *

While working on this Unthemely puzzle, I started thinking about traditional crossword specifications and the rationale behind them. Some specs serve a practical purpose. Checking all letters in a grid, for example, reduces the chances of a solver getting stuck on a single unknown answer. Some specs reflect the standards used in adjacent journalistic and entertainment practices. The rules about obscure and indelicate vocabulary fall in this category. Some specs are simply aesthetic choices invented for the medium. The rotational symmetry of black squares is such a choice.

Rather than putting crosswords rules in specific categories, suppose we rank them on a “rationale” scale of 0 to 10, where 0 represents practical/derivative and 10 represents arbitrary. The “No two-letter words” rule might rank a 3 on this scale, while “No more than 72 entries in a themeless grid” might be an 8 or 9. I have a question based on this hypothetical scale: where would you rank the rule that discourages or prohibits the duplication of words or word forms (e.g. EATS and ATECROW) in the same grid? Remember that a ranking reflects how much the rule serves a practical purpose or represents an artistic standard that extends outside the world of crossword puzzles.